Rafael jets row:with two hostile neighbours India cannot afford to waste time on technicalities of deal

The purchase of 36 Rafale jets from France is mired in such deep controversy that its is more confusing than enlightening.

Perhaps what is needed is, to remove the element of overwhelming expertise and fiscal semantics and discuss this in day-to-day layman terms.

Let’s take the cost of the aircraft. It is complex and predicated to a confidentiality clause on both sides and we will never know what was paid for it except that there are a dozen figures out there. Depending on who is doing the calculations the cost of Rafale jets, in most parts, is lower than what Egypt and Qatar paid for their aircraft.
Then there is the mind numbing procedural nomenclature. Ajai Shukla wrote forĀ Business Standard, “both (Nirmala) Sitharaman and (Manohar) Parrikar point out the defence procurement procedure (DPP) permits regular procurement procedures to be bypassed on strategic grounds. Indeed, Paragraph 71 of the DPP caters for ‘occasions when procurements would have to be done from friendly foreign countries which may be necessitated due to geo-strategic advantages that are likely to accrue to our country.'”

However, Paragraph 71 also stipulates that this requires prior clearance. It says, “such procurements will be done based on an Inter-Governmental Agreement after clearance from Competent Financial Authority (CFA)”, in this case the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS).

Further, Paragraph 73 of the DPP says, “decisions on all such (strategic) acquisitions would be taken by the CCS on the recommendations of the Defence Procurement Board (DPB)”.

No ministry or cabinet body was consulted before Prime Minister Narendra Modi committed India to the Rafale purchase on 10 April, 2015. The CCS sanction was processed and obtained only later.

The prime minister didn’t follow procedure.

After which, there comes the questions. Why didn’t the NDA do the deal? What was the UPA doing? Why did the prime minister make a unilateral announcement in Paris and stun his team? What’s the deal with Reliance Defense? What took the IAF five years of trials to okay the choice when a posse of air marshals with wings on their chests should have worked it out by just reading Jane’s Book of Aircraft.

It is a never ending gobbledygook and what we should be asking is, did we need these aircraft? And the answer to that question is, yes. Why are we wasting time on these technicalities? We are 11 squadrons short, our MIG 21s (flying coffins) fell away years ago and the call to add muscle now is shrill and filled with anxiety.

In man to man language, I bought a flight ticket for Rs 11,000 in early November. I booked the same route for Rs 28,000 now because it is the new year week. This is known as good business practice.

We all understand that and perhaps this is exactly what Modi intended to do: get the aircraft because we need the aircraft. We have two hostile neighbours with planes in the sky and we cannot afford to sit on our thumbs.

If anything is the weak link, it is having to wait for these 36 fighters till 2019 rather than being able to get them now because that is how long it takes to get them manufactured.

Now, if some aviation authority recommended that we wet lease fighter aircraft in the interim I’d listen regardless of the cost.

Look at the ground reality. Of the sanctioned 42 squadrons (years ago) we have only 32 at present, of which some are flying obsolete planes or are grounded for spares as with the MiG 23s and MiG 27s.

Does this give a decent picture of a sorry mess?

So, with our reputation for stalling and hemming and hawing and even frequently asking shamelessly for kickbacks, there is not much excitement on the global market for an Indian bid.

Give Modi a pass on this one. If it actually turns out that we did pay less than the other customers, all this becomes moot.

Still in layman terms, shouldn’t we rather sleep well at night knowing our pilots are safe and so are we?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *